Start in context
Enter where the work begins
Start a new program, address an existing gap or review a material change. Select the relevant scope and reuse the records you already have.
ZeroSpace / A guided Zero Trust journey
Build on existing documentation, automate transaction mapping and follow a guided journey from business purpose to implementation and validation. Connect projects into a wider Zero Trust program while keeping ownership and evidence with the work.
Projects and the guided journey
A ZeroSpace project is a shared workspace for a defined business service, application or improvement effort. It brings purpose, owners, architecture, protect surfaces, transactions, decisions and delivery evidence together. The guided journey helps your team turn that context into the next practical action.
Start in context
Start a new program, address an existing gap or review a material change. Select the relevant scope and reuse the records you already have.
Follow the journey
Work through purpose and ownership, current state, protection, transactions, coverage gaps, target planning, implementation, validation and continuing review. Each step identifies the responsible role, linked work and what is needed next.
Keep moving
Return to a saved journey, request a handoff or open the expert workspace for detailed work on the same records. Forge can help explain context and prepare proposals; people retain review and approval.
Progress follows saved work and reviewed evidence. Teams can revisit priorities and record exceptions while keeping delivery, validation and unresolved gaps visible.
Automated transaction mapping
Static diagrams are difficult to keep current and rarely explain the identity, operation and evidence behind an access path. ZeroSpace processes authorized source windows, normalizes and deduplicates observations, and correlates supported evidence into transaction patterns for review.
Discover
Bring supported audit, access and telemetry observations into a bounded discovery workflow. Retain participants, operations, timing, outcomes and source lineage rather than treating every network edge as a business transaction.
Reconcile and map
Review service, resource and principal identities. Associate selected patterns with existing transactions or create model drafts, then inspect the transaction map and associated inventory together.
Compare and improve
Use versioned observation windows to compare behavior while retaining scope and coverage limits. Keep required, configured, observed and validated access distinct as you plan policy and implementation changes.
Spend less effort rebuilding the map and more time deciding which access the business needs. Automatic discovery supplies evidence; reviewers retain identity, association and policy decisions. Missing observations remain unknown.
Existing architecture and reference documents
Your team has already invested in diagrams and reference material. Bring that work into the project, review what it says and use the accepted details to build a connected architecture model.
Import
Import supported Microsoft Visio (.vsdx), draw.io and native architecture JSON files. Add PDF documents and PNG or JPEG images as reviewable source material.
Review
Inspect extracted diagram candidates, correct names and relationships, and match them to existing records. Annotate PDF and image sources to identify the details you want to carry into the model.
Build
Preview and accept reviewed candidates into a native model draft. Retain the original document, source revision and review decisions so the team can trace each accepted detail back to its source.
Documented architecture provides a starting point. Connect it to transaction evidence and validation as the project develops.
Connected projects and program coordination
A wider Zero Trust program spans applications, environments and delivery teams. Link projects through reviewed application references and shared improvement initiatives, while preserving each project's scope, owners, permissions and evidence.
Application context
Reference an existing logical application from another authorized project, retaining the reviewed source revision and the reason for the connection.
Shared improvement
Connect local application adoption to a shared initiative, such as identity modernization. Record prerequisites, dependencies, overlaps and alternatives so teams can see how their work fits together.
Program visibility
Use the program view to follow common delivery alongside each application's commitment, configuration, blockers and validation. Each team retains responsibility for its own adoption and evidence.
For example, a customer portal project and its migration project can reference the same application and adopt a shared identity initiative. Each retains its own implementation plan and validation results.
Purpose and priorities
Establish the current state, responsibilities and priorities. Connect the Customer Portal application to its declared members, business purpose and Protect Surface.
Automated transaction mapping in context
Discover transaction patterns automatically from supported audit, access and telemetry evidence. Review identity bindings and associate selected patterns with your application model, then explore the map and the evidence behind each transaction. Source, time window and review state stay with the evidence; unobserved access remains unknown.
Attack Surface / Forge
Forge automates the first pass of attack-surface analysis using your selected architecture, protection objectives, identities and transaction context. It proposes attack-path hypotheses, identifies prerequisites and missing evidence, and suggests mitigation options for review.
Explore access to a resource and potential impact from a component. Trace findings to their supporting relationships, review assumptions and contradictory evidence, then accept selected Forge proposals as finding drafts for improvement planning and validation.
Implementation coordination
Bring agreed implementation work onto a shared board. Track dependencies and mixed work states while preserving the distinction between delivery and validation.
Validation and improvement
Review recommendations, record validation evidence and communicate what remains unresolved. Revisit decisions as the environment and program change.
Fit to your environment
Plan across AWS, Azure, GCP, on-premises and hybrid environments. Specific collection and automation capabilities depend on the supported integration and agreed scope. A program plan is not proof that every transaction has been automatically mapped.
Assistance
Use authorized product context to support analysis and drafting. People retain decision and approval authority.
Explore ForgeStrategy support
Work with our team on strategy, architecture choices and ongoing evidence-based review. Software and consulting are independently available.
Explore consultingProduct resource
Explore automated transaction mapping, purpose, owned implementation and continuing validation.
Request the brochureValidation evidence
Inspect the method, scope and evidence behind recorded checks. Contradicted, inconclusive and not-run results remain part of the program.
Program decisions
Keep maturity, architecture evidence, delivery priorities and investment assumptions connected across the Zero Trust program.
Maturity and gaps
Review evidence against scoped maturity criteria, record a target and turn gaps into owned requirements and improvement work. Completed tasks do not automatically change the assessed maturity stage.
Architecture intake
Bring in native JSON, draw.io, Visio, PDF and image sources. Review extracted candidates and their original source before accepting them into the model; a drawing does not establish deployed access.
Investment and portfolio
Coordinate initiatives, adoption and project priorities. Compare costs, capacity, forecasts and actuals with attributable assumptions, sensitivity and review. An estimate is separate from realized savings.
Let’s talk
Start with your program priorities, protect surfaces and the decisions waiting on evidence.
[s] = demonstration data