About Threat Foundry

Built for security teams that need intelligence to become action.

Threat Foundry is an Atlanta, Georgia cybersecurity company focused on the operating gap between threat intelligence, external exposure, threat hunting, detection engineering, investigation, cases, and reporting. The platform is built to help teams move faster without losing the analyst review, evidence, and decision history that make security work accountable.

Talk with us See how it works
Analyst controlAutomation should accelerate review, not hide the reasoning behind it.
Evidence firstSource context, generated work, execution results, and handoffs stay connected.
Operational fitThreat work has to match real telemetry, staffing, tools, and response paths.
Measurable outcomesUseful security work should leave coverage, cases, reports, and decisions behind.

Why We Exist

Security teams do not need more disconnected queues.

CTI, EASM, SIEM data, detections, cases, and reports often live in separate workflows. That separation creates noise, missed context, duplicated effort, and weak handoff between teams.

1

Decide

Rank what deserves attention based on source quality, relevance, severity, telemetry, and analyst judgment.

2

Generate

Turn approved intelligence into hunts, attack paths, Sigma candidates, YARA candidates, and investigation pivots.

3

Validate

Run safely, review results, enrich entities, and prove whether activity is meaningful or noise.

4

Handoff

Move evidence into cases, tickets, reporting, coverage decisions, and leadership views.

What We Believe

The platform should teach the operation, not just run the workflow.

Threat Foundry is built around the idea that good security operations depend on why a decision was made as much as what button was clicked.

Reviewed intelligence beats raw feeds

Raw reporting becomes useful only when analysts can preserve source, severity, timeliness, ATT&CK/CVE context, disposition, and confidence.

Exposure belongs beside hunts

External assets, exposed services, KEVs, DNS/email posture, identity exposure, and watchlists should inform the same operating model as CTI and investigations.

Detection engineering needs evidence

Sigma and YARA work should remain tied to the evidence and ATT&CK mapping that justified the rule, including review state and promotion controls.

Reporting is part of operations

Cases, coverage, source yield, hunt outcomes, and executive views should come from the work itself, not a separate scramble after the fact.

For SOC and hunt teamsPrioritized hunt work, controlled query execution, entity pivots, case handoff, and repeatable operating rhythm.
For CTI and exposure teamsSource review, curation learning, EASM context, watchlists, KEV focus, and relevance scoring.
For security leadersCoverage, outcomes, auditability, risk context, service options, and reporting that explains what changed.

Work With Us

Bring CTI, exposure, hunting, detections, and reporting into one operating model.

Threat Foundry supports customers through the platform, professional services, threat hunting as a service, and strategic security program guidance.

Start the conversation